Mike wrote:
Sorry, but I disagree about it being for show, Christopher, on either part. What I did was engage him in conversation minus useless name calling. I prefer substance. And by the way, I have to keep a strong hold on my natural inclination to be sarcastic, and there is much fodder for the sarcasm cow around here. I'm fully capable of cutting and slashing with the best of them. I was even given a sweatshirt by a family member on the front of which says "National Sarcasm Society- Like We Need Your Support" But God strengthens me, and most of the time, it is under control. I think it more profitable to engage thoughtfully, regardless of how much I disagree with someone, though sometimes I fail to do so.
"National Sarcasm Society- Like We Need Your Support" Lol. Love it!
![]()
It's a shame that he cut the convo short because your line of reasoning was beginning to show the holes in his poor analogy, whether you intended that or not.
It's a shame that he cut the convo short because your line of reasoning was beginning to show the holes in his poor analogy, whether you intended that or not.