Comment by: Mike from New York at 10/28/2014 11:04:39 AM

Christopher000 wrote:
--- Lurker, he knew what you meant but can't have a conversation without some sort of sarcasm, conflict, abuse, or whatever. He did have one with Mike recently, but that was for show.

Sorry, but I disagree about it being for show, Christopher, on either part. What I did was engage him in conversation minus useless name calling. I prefer substance. And by the way, I have to keep a strong hold on my natural inclination to be sarcastic, and there is much fodder for the sarcasm cow around here. I'm fully capable of cutting and slashing with the best of them. I was even given a sweatshirt by a family member on the front of which says "National Sarcasm Society- Like We Need Your Support" But God strengthens me, and most of the time, it is under control. I think it more profitable to engage thoughtfully, regardless of how much I disagree with someone, though sometimes I fail to do so.